| Pages: [1] |
1. CSM Statement: Not today??? (From Twitter) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dex Ironmind Originally by: Maj Disaster As I understand it the English statement is ready for release NOW and we are waiting for a German and Russian translation to be made. I have never noticed CCP making translat...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.07.01 18:51:00
|
2. CSM Statement: Not today??? (From Twitter) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As I understand it the English statement is ready for release NOW and we are waiting for a German and Russian translation to be made. I have never noticed CCP making translated versions of any announcements previously and whilst I can understand ...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.07.01 18:40:00
|
3. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trebor_CSM Robert Woodhead @ @EVE_Svennig Unclear if formal minutes needed. Joint statement + clarifications in forums may be enough #tweetfleet #csm6 1 minute ago Formal minutes are definitely needed!! We need to see HOW the decisions were arriv...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.06.30 16:50:00
|
4. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
#CSM TheMittani The Mittani We're in the nitty gritty examining metrics related to the crisis, seeing which player demos have unsubbed. So far, things are ok. #csm6 7 minutes ago At least they are looking at the unsubbed which shows it was wort...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.06.30 12:36:00
|
5. Thank you Monocle Purchasers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Would suck to be a serious "internet spaceship" Dev tho, imagine coming into work with a really cool idea for a new ship type to be told "Sorry mate, you're on Socks and Underpants this month" lol
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.06.29 22:01:00
|
6. Thank you Monocle Purchasers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Obsidian Cobra Edited by: Obsidian Cobra on 29/06/2011 21:29:37 sorry for the messed up post BUT the RISK is that there will be No more Plex on the market.. Arum will be the new thing to get... That means you be forced b...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.06.29 21:47:00
|
7. [ELITE] - The first cyno alt with monocle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bloodpetal I hope this prompts CCP to realize how stupid it is to not have these items destructible. The monocle owners should be petitioning CCP to make them destructible. The truly rich would not worry about the cos...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.06.29 18:35:00
|
8. [SERIOUS REQUEST] - Introduce an elite monocle - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Agreed, there should be no limit to the tax on stupidity. Though more importantly a change should be introduced so that the item is lost when you are podded, after all only the truly rich would risk wearing one then if there was a chance of it be...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.06.29 11:40:00
|
9. If EVE were CCP's only game. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think the OP is right to a point, imagine what they could have done to improve EVE (and thereby increase subscriptions and profits) if all the income had been spent on development of EVE rather than spreading themselves to thin by trying to deve...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.06.28 20:17:00
|
10. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CSM is already AGREEING TO NON VANITY ITEMS I'm going to click YES to all NON VANITY items. Hope you enjoy the ride. This means nothing, its not a CCP site, its not a genuine CSM forum. The CSM will take none of the results from the polls on th...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2011.06.28 13:33:00
|
11. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty--Breaking the Chains - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: RevrendStyx Originally by: Maj Disaster This change has little to do with improving EVE and fixing some of the past mistakes of sovereignty and alliances and more to do with changing the mechanics to align with the n...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2009.09.22 16:57:00
|
12. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty--Breaking the Chains - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This change has little to do with improving EVE and fixing some of the past mistakes of sovereignty and alliances and more to do with changing the mechanics to align with the new game they are developing and to force people to pay subscription to ...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2009.09.22 15:11:00
|
13. GTC market crash? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As the op has already stated, the isk is to be used to buy BPO's. This is the big problem with GTC, the people selling valuable items would be unable to demand such a high price for them if they did not know that someone who is wealthy in the real...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2008.02.05 10:48:00
|
14. Should suicide gankers get insurance payout? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Laboratus Yes they should. Empire should have consequense in line with other consequense, it should be safer, removing insurance would make it safe, and that is wrong. and what exctly are the cosiquences for the ganker ...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2007.09.01 10:28:00
|
15. Should suicide gankers get insurance payout? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No one who is shot by concord should receive insurance payout. No one who commits an act of aggression against another player should receive insurance payout. No one who is destroyed whilst fighting war targets should receive insurance payout.
- by Maj Disaster - at 2007.08.31 14:40:00
|
16. Any reason europeans have to pay more ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Of course the U.S. players need to pay less subscription, dont be mean, how would they be able to afford to buy thier isk if they paid the same as us......... But the reality of it is because we are dumb enough to put up with paying more for th...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2007.06.22 14:08:00
|
17. The Jita Solution! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Maj Disaster on 03/12/2006 22:57:49 HereÆs a better solution... ---------------------------------------------------- A horrific industrial accident believed to have been a direct result of slipping safety standards in the notorious...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2006.12.03 22:57:00
|
18. CCP Endorses online ISK buying? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP should remove the links to the so called "fan sites" which advertise or promote isk selling or any other cheats. There is no excuse for "fan sites" not having proper control over the types of site they earn their revenue from and indeed if th...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2006.03.10 00:34:00
|
19. OK, what is CCP doing about this? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Maj Disaster on 27/02/2006 04:11:46 Whilst ccp make it this easy to buy isk the macro miners will always be present: A link on eve-online.com's main home webpage linking to a well known "fan site" eve-db. (the one with the usa flag...
- by Maj Disaster - at 2006.02.27 04:10:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |